Defensible answers.
Dual-cited.

A governed, citation-grounded knowledge and workflow layer for gaming compliance, responsible gaming, and AML teams. Every answer cites the state regulation and the internal SOP it satisfies.

knowledgeXpert · Gaming Compliance online

See knowledgeXpert in action

A 4-minute walkthrough of citation-grounded answers, dual-citation regulator response drafts, and the Audit Evidence Index.

See knowledgeXpert run a sanitized version of your regulator response workflow in a 15-minute call.

Book a 15-min walkthrough

Three workflows. One governed knowledge layer.

The same controlled corpus powers regulator response, jurisdictional Q&A, and audit evidence. Every output carries dual citations.

Regulator Response & Evidence Packet Builder

Enter the regulator request, jurisdiction, control ID, and timeframe. The Builder pulls the applicable state regulation, maps it to the matching internal SOP, drafts a dual-citation response narrative, and produces a submission-ready evidence index.

State-by-State RG & AML Q&A

Ask jurisdictional questions in plain English. Compare self-exclusion requirements across states. Cross-reference FinCEN and state AML guidance against internal policy. Every answer is cited at both layers.

Audit Evidence Index

A structured evidence checklist showing source documents, owners, control references, and implementation status. Built for internal audit, regulator submissions, and the next 5-state expansion.

Plus regulatory change-impact analysis, RG escalation playbooks, marketing/disclosure review, and tutorXpert reinforcement. See the free Gaming Compliance Guide to AI.

Common questions

How long until our first regulator response is dual-cited? +
Week 1 we load a scoped corpus: one or two states, the matching internal SOPs, and your most recent five regulator requests for reference. Week 2 we stand up the Regulator Response Builder, the State-by-State RG & AML Q&A app, and the Audit Evidence Index. Week 3 two of your analysts run live cases with supervision. Week 4 you measure time-to-first-draft and reviewer disagreement and decide where to expand. No integration project, no new hires.
How is this different from ChatGPT or NotebookLM? +
ChatGPT trains on the open web and paraphrases regulations. NotebookLM is a reader, not a workflow. knowledgeXpert only retrieves from documents you control, cites every claim back to the exact PDF and page via viewXpert, and pairs every regulator answer with the internal SOP that satisfies it. No hallucinations. No leaked case notes. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, tenant-isolated per operator. Your data never trains a public model.
Is this defensible enough to put in front of a state regulator? +
That is the point of the platform. Every output carries two citations: the external regulation (state statute, regulator bulletin, FinCEN guidance) and the internal control or SOP that implements it. Your analyst clicks through to the source PDF and page before submitting. Reviewer-in-the-loop is the default posture. The platform is decision support and evidence organization, not an autonomous submitter.
How do you handle a regulation change in one state? +
When a state rule changes, the platform flags every internal SOP, training module, and workflow that references it. You get a change-impact summary with owners, due dates, and approval status. Your team works the list instead of hunting for downstream effects.
What about security, data residency, and audit logs? +
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR-aligned. Tenant-isolated per operator. SSO, role-based access, full audit log of every query and citation click. Your prompts and documents are never used to train a public model. Data residency options on Enterprise. Our team will sign your standard MNDA and respond to a security questionnaire before a pilot.
What does it cost? +
Fifty dollars per seat per month. Team plan starts at 3 seats with 4,000 weighted units; Enterprise at 10+ seats with 5,000 weighted units and data-residency options. 7-day free trial. A credit card is required to start the trial, but you won't be charged during the trial period. Custom MSAs available for Enterprise pilots.
What if it doesn't work for our environment? +
If your team isn't drafting regulator responses faster by Week 4, you keep the curated KnowledgeBase regardless. The corpus and the dual-citation mappings are yours. The worst case is you walk away with a permanent asset: a clean, governed compliance knowledge base that you can plug into whatever you want next.

Defensible answers.
Dual-cited.

Self-serve the trial, or have us run knowledgeXpert against a sanitized version of your regulator response workflow live in a 15-minute call.

or, talk to our team →
Free field guide

The Gaming Compliance Guide to AI — Without the Hallucinations

Why generic AI fails gaming compliance, the 7 questions to ask any vendor, and a 30-day pilot gameplan for your first state.

Download the guide (PDF)
PDF, no email required