The request you repeat, run as an app.
Same inputs, same steps, same shape of answer, and a review step where a person still signs off.
Different work, the same shape
Three packaged apps from three different practices. Note what they have in common: named inputs, a fixed sequence, a stop for a person, and a cited artifact.
Input Case file, 214 documents
- Four questions the file does not answer
Input ILI run, line 12, 1,412 anomalies
- Three grew beyond threshold since 2021
Input RFQ, 14 line items
- Two items have no cross-reference
Four things a packaged app gives you that a prompt does not
The tenth time should not cost what the first did
The request you get every week has the same inputs, the same steps and the same shape of answer every time. What changes is the file. That is a workflow, and it is currently being done by hand by whoever is free.
A person still signs it
Every workflow has a review step, and it is not decoration. The app stops, shows you what it found and what it wants to do, and waits. Anything that would go out under your name goes out because you released it.
The deliverable arrives cited
Not a summary you then have to verify line by line. Each statement in the output names the document and page behind it, so checking it is reading rather than re-doing it.
It is an app, not a prompt
Your team opens a named app with the fields it needs and presses run. Nobody has to be good at asking, nobody has to remember last month’s wording, and the tenth run is the same as the first.
Before you hand over a workflow
Is this a chatbot with extra steps?
No, and the difference is the interface. A packaged app has named inputs, a fixed sequence, a review step and a defined output. There is no prompt to get right and no wording to remember, which is exactly why the tenth run matches the first. Chat exists too, and it is a different tool for a different job.
What happens at the review step?
The run stops and shows you what it has found and what it proposes, the substitution, the flagged inconsistency, the item with no match. You approve, adjust or stop. It does not proceed past that point on its own, and that is deliberate rather than a limitation we are working on removing.
Who builds the workflow?
We build the first ones with you, from the requests you already repeat, and your team can build more. The Marketplace also carries installable apps and templates so you are not starting from a blank canvas.
Can it run over documents I have not approved?
No. A workflow reads the knowledgeBases you put in scope and nothing else. The scope is a decision you make and can inspect, on every run.
Which request does your team do every week?
Bring that one. Twenty minutes, and you will see it run on your own documents with a stop where your review belongs.